Tuesday, September 28, 2010

Nuclear Weapon vs Nuclear Reactor


Figure 1: Fat man ( picture taken from :http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_weapon)


Nuclear weapon is an explosive device that derives its destructive force from nuclear reactions, either fission or the combination of fusion and fission. Usually a nucleus tends to change its form to stable state if it is in an unstable state.Fission is a process of an excited (high energy level) nucleus splitting into two fragments and thus releasing energy to be stable. This process also releases neutron and this free neutron if bombarded on another nucleus, would make the nucleus excited and unstable and the process repeats. This is where the chain reactions starts. 

                                                                                                                      







Figure 2: Fission Process (picture taken from : http://www.atomicarchive.com/Fission/Fission1.shtml)


Where fission is a process of splitting a nucleus, fusion is a process of two or more atomic nuclei joining together to form a single heavier nucleus and releasing an amount of energy and neutron as a by product. The released neutron might hit a nucleus and fission could occur and chain reaction starts.


Figure 3: Fusion Process 
Picture taken from http://mrbarlow.wordpress.com/tag/chemistry/


There are two basic type of  nuclear weapons and the first type is the Atom bomb which produces its explosive energy from fission. Usually for fission weapons, a mass of fissile material which is enriched uranium is assembled into a supercritical mass (k> 1). For this type of bombs, Uranium is enriched to a level of above 90%. Comparing this to a normal nuclear reactor, the enrichment level is just around 4-5%. This shows how much more safer the nuclear reactor is compared to the nuclear weapon. Adding to it, a nuclear reactor is usually kept at critical level where k=1. K is the neutron multiplication factor. What does K show is , if 

K= 1,  Then the mass is in critical state where the fissile material is self sustaining whereby there is no increase or decrease in power, temperature and neutron population. 

K<1, The mass is in subcritical state and the mass is said not to have the ability to sustain fission reaction, where the neutron population decays exponentially.

K>1, The mass is in supercritical state where there is an increasing rate of fission. 


So, in a bomb, the critical level is made to be in supercritical state so that the explosion would take place and continuously explode and create a massive effect on the area. In a nuclear reactor the criticality level is kept at critical state and this is done by the usage of control rods which would absorb excess neutron. From this, we could see that nuclear reactors are much more safer and is designed and maintained at a safe level. 






9 comments:

  1. Please make your writing less technical, and more accessible.

    ReplyDelete
  2. To the creator thanks for the info.My question will be based on the fusion.From what i can understand in this process the neutron is released as a by produc which leads to the chain reaction later on.My question will be is the every released neutron will hit a nucleus to lead to the succesful chain reaction.If yes what will be the chances or the probability.Can you plz give details on it.thanks. ( VIMALAN A/l GENASAN vimalan_12@yahoo.com )

    ReplyDelete
  3. Can you please explain what kind of reaction(fusion or fussion) cause the Chernobyl disaster. And how can we avoid such a catastrophic failure in future
    -vaageesan ganeesan-
    macha15_swimfaster@yahoo.com

    ReplyDelete
  4. dear blogger,how do you ensure the safety of the nuclear power plant?what are the safety measures to ensure that the stability level is kept constant at all times?also,by using a high amount of nuclear energy to produce energy,what is the efficiency of this power plant?
    DINESH A/L RAGURAJAN(ME083537)
    dineshdpau@gmail.com

    ReplyDelete
  5. I would like to know, since we are aware of, that in a nuclear reactor the state is kept critical by means of control rods, is it possible 2 have them in nuclear weapons as well so that the power dissipited by a nuclear weapon could be controlled,thus not having all explosion by means of a nuclear weapon a catastrophic disaster.

    R.Tevan Nair (ME083630)
    dr.spiceinlife@yahoo.com

    ReplyDelete
  6. Hi guys..... Sorry for the delay in answering your questions. Vimalan, the neutrons released from the fission bombarding on another particle is all on probability basis. In nuclear we have a term called microscopic cross section which means effective target area that a single nucleus presents to a bombarding particle. To put it in an easier way, the value shows the probability of a neutron bombarding on the nucleus and we have a specific term microscopic cross section of fission which would answer your question very well. The unit for it is barns or cm2. The typical value for a uranium-235 is 582 barns as said here (http://www.tpub.com/content/doe/h1019v2/css/h1019v2_31.htm)

    ReplyDelete
  7. Hi Vaageesan, whether a reaction occurring is due to fission or fusion is all depending on probability as well. We can't predict how the nucleus would react after being bombarded by the neutron. It also depends on cross sections ( probability). So, which one caused the Chernobyl accident is something that I can't answer. As for the details of the accident please do check out this page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chernobyl_disaster

    ReplyDelete
  8. Hi Dinesh, for your question please do refer to our post called "why is a nuclear reactor safe" and for the efficiency please refer to our post "types of reactors and options". The table has the efficiency of each type of nuclear power plant.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Tevan, its a good question that you have asked but let me ask you, what is a nuclear bomb if it doesn't create massive destruction. Wouldn't that defeat the purpose of the bomb. Which is why control rods are needed in nuclear reactors but not in nuclear bombs. Furthermore, control rods are literally rods in shape and placement of them on the bomb would require more space and its a hassle.

    ReplyDelete