Sunday, October 3, 2010

Why is a Nuclear Reactor Safe?

After the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki; the word nuclear referred as the weapon of mass destruction; but  if the nuclear power is harvest in a proper way, we could generate mass amount of clean green energy with just small amount of fuel. The question that most of the people ask about  The most commonly asked question about a nuclear power plant is that, is it safe?  As we all know the reason for this question is that the amount of radiation from the nuclear reactor fuel can harm thousands of lives.        
                This concern is not necessary because the nuclear reactor technology is been around for almost half a decade and nuclear scientist and engineers have learned a lot so far on the safety measures of a nuclear power plant. Engineers have equip the nuclear power plants with  lasts technology which ranges from different types of field from radiation containment, reactor temperature control, back-up electricity to plane crash protection.
                If we talk about the radiation containment, the whole nuclear reactor is place inside a ceramic containment building as show in figure 1. This ceramic containment building which is usually called the dome is shield steel and concrete missile shield which could with stand missile attacks and airplane crashes in case of any attacks to nuclear power plant. Furthermore, even thought the core of the reactor melts down the containment building the capability to contain the radiation from the reactor core from spreading out.  
                The next safety features is the moderators and the control rods. Moderators in simple words are the element which slows down the neutron which starts the fission process in the fuel cell. This is important because when neutrons are in thermal (slow), this enables us to control the fission process rate or the reactivity. This way we can ensure that the reaction rate is in the safest level and produce energy in the required amount only. However the control rods in the other hand have the ability to absorb neutron and drastically reduce the reaction rate or the fission rate to minimum level. The control rod are usually used when in emergencies to reduce the fission level when the reaction rate reaches high level and produces high amount of energy. This safety features ensures any kind of reactor melt downs.
                Next is the use of backup generates which help to produce electricity to the power plant in case of any emergency and the plant had to shut down its reactor core. So even thought the plant doesn’t obtain electricity from the reactor, it will have enough electricity to engage active safety features of the power plant. As show in figure 2 the plant has 2 generators instate of one for safety reasons. If the 1st generator is not working there is always the 2nd generator to produce enough electricity for the plant.
                Therefore the new generation nuclear power plants are over designed for better safety and to ensure from any nuclear disaster from happening.  We can say that the current and future Nuclear Power Plant are safe and reliable in every way to keep our bulbs glowing with electricity that we need. 

10 comments:

  1. What i would like to know is, as a citizens point of view where would be the reasonable site or base for a nuclear power plant in Malaysia?

    Is it the peninsular or the regoin of Sabah and Sarawak? the adequate location would be in the region of Sabah and Sarawak, if so, hw would be the energy transfered to the peninsular??

    R.Tevan Nair (ME083630)
    dr.spiceinlife@yahoo.com

    ReplyDelete
  2. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  3. From what i have read, two of the long term effect of nuclear radiation are cancer and leukemia even though we are only expose to a very small amount of it. But, what is the actual level of radiation that it takes to cause this disease? I hope with the modern technology, the radiation can be "filtered" so that the level of radiation is less than the actual radiation that cause this killer disease.

    Syarifah Nur Hamizah Bt Syed Kasim
    ME083650
    ija_rc@yahoo.com

    ReplyDelete
  4. Hi.. We are the authors of the blog... Tevan as for your question the space needed for the construction of the nuclear power plant is considerably low and therefore there is no need for the construction to be in Sabah Sarawak region. It could be anywhere but it has to be in a place that has large amount of water for the cooling purpose. "A project involving laying a 730 km high-voltage direct current transmission line and a 670 km undersea cable for the 2,400-megawatt Bakun hydroelectric dam has been considered[6]. This may connect all three of Malaysia's electric utility companies with state grids: Tenaga Nasional Berhad (TNB), Sarawak Electricity Supply Corporation (SESCO) and Sabah Electricity Sdn Bhd (SESB)." This is taken from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Grid,_Malaysia.. So this could be the solution for transferring the electricity if its in Sabah Sarawak region.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Hi Syarifah, for your question I suggest you to visit these pages.
    1. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2477710/

    2. http://www.cancer.org/cancer/cancercauses/othercarcinogens/medicaltreatments/radiation-exposure-and-cancer

    Many of us are thinking that radiation could only be received from nuclear reactors. Let me expose something to you now. The normal food that we are eating on our daily basis which are high on potassiums are also emitting radiation to us. This includes banana. Even flying on an airplane would give us some radiation. From the article above it is said that most of the cancer cases reported are on normal citizens and not the ones working in a nuclear facility. I hope the article would help to answer your question.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Let say,if the 1st and 2nd generator malfunction at the same time due to some major or minor causes even several measures taken to fix it,what will be the solution to overcome this type of case?

    M.VIVAN (CE083462)
    naviv.viva@gmail.com

    ReplyDelete
  7. Why is a Nuclear Reactor Safe? Is nuclear safe should be the topic,its just like a ''time-bomb'',waiting to tick off. There's is never a safe enough category, because we learn from our mistakes and rectify to be better.So we cannot say for sure if it is safe.The risk is to high compared to the benefits.
    OM GAJENDRA KUMARAN
    ME083617
    ogk_om@hotmail.com

    ReplyDelete
  8. ''After the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki; the word nuclear referred as the weapon of mass destruction'' i agree with this .If we say that nuclear is green. How many percent of the public would agree? The public is not well-informed about the advantage and how the disadvantages is avoid.We should organize more talks of nuclear for the public

    EYU ZHI MING
    ME083541
    invader81@hotmail.com

    ReplyDelete
  9. Hi,
    What if some disaster happen such as flood,does they have a way to stop this from destroy it?
    should we build it on high place?

    Alif Shahzuan(me086293)
    fila_smksg@yahoo.com

    ReplyDelete